APMDC Suliyari coal upcoming auction 1,00,000 MT for MP MSME on 1st Oct 2024 / 1st Nov 2024 & 2nd Dec 2024 @ SBP INR 2516/- per MT

APMDC Suliyari coal upcoming auction 75,000 MT for Pan India Open on 15th Oct 2024 / 15th Nov 2024 & 16th Dec 2024 @ SBP INR 3000/- per MT

Notice regarding Bidder Demo of CIL Tranche VII STEEL-Coking SUB-SECTOR of NRS Linkage e-Auction scheduled on 19.09.2024 from 12:30 P.M. to 1:30 P.M. in Coaljunction portal

Login Register Contact Us
Welcome to Linkage e-Auctions Welcome to Coal Trading Portal Welcome to APMDC Suliyari Coal

Coal news and updates

Coal industry lobby won’t admit to role in climate change

28 Apr 2014

American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity CEO refuses to answer burning questions at Colorado mining conference

Does burning coal, one of the most carbon-intensive fuel sources on the planet, contribute to climate change?

That simple question stumped the industry’s most prominent advocate, Robert “Mike” Duncan, at a Colorado mining conference last week. Asked twice by Republic Report, Duncan first said that a “lot of people believe” that coal causes climate change, before replying, “I’m not answering your question.”

Duncan, the president and CEO of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE), gave a talk to a room filled with mining industry executives about the dangers of new EPA rules concerning greenhouse emissions. ACCCE, which represents the largest coal companies in the nation, has pushed back against the administration’s coal power plant rules. In an interview with E&E TV in January, Duncan said that instead of the EPA rules, his industry could take a gradual approach to reducing emissions with carbon capture sequestration, which he claimed can “make coal even cleaner.”

Critics argue that carbon sequestration technology — which is designed to store carbon from coal plants underground — is untested and unlikely to ever safely contain carbon pollution in perpetuity. As DeSmogBlog notes, “a 2012 study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science concludes that even a small earthquake event in the US has the potential to release stored carbon back into the atmosphere, making ‘large-scale CCS a risky, and likely unsuccessful, strategy for significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions.’”

In a letter to the New York Times editor last year, Duncan argued that coal regulations would have “no meaningful impact on global climate change” because “closing down our entire coal fleet would reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by just 3 percent.” Such a small change, Duncan wrote, would only reduce global average temperatures by about .03 degrees Fahrenheit. Such a statement, one might infer, would suggest that Duncan understands that burning coal contributes to climate change.

Source: Salon