APMDC Suliyari coal upcoming auction 1,00,000 MT for MP MSME on 1st Oct 2024 / 1st Nov 2024 & 2nd Dec 2024 @ SBP INR 2516/- per MT

APMDC Suliyari coal upcoming auction 75,000 MT for Pan India Open on 15th Oct 2024 / 15th Nov 2024 & 16th Dec 2024 @ SBP INR 3000/- per MT

Notice regarding Bidder Demo of CIL Tranche VII STEEL-Coking SUB-SECTOR of NRS Linkage e-Auction scheduled on 19.09.2024 from 12:30 P.M. to 1:30 P.M. in Coaljunction portal

Login Register Contact Us
Welcome to Linkage e-Auctions Welcome to Coal Trading Portal Welcome to APMDC Suliyari Coal

Coal news and updates

Court strikes down Minnesota’s landmark anti-coal law

22 Apr 2014

 
How’s this for bad neighbors: Minnesota’s landmark ban on new power generation from coal was struck down last week after a federal judge ruled it wasn’t fair to North Dakota.
 
Backing up a bit, Minnesota took the stand against fossil fuels back in 2007 as part of its Next Generation Energy Act, which included a provision requiring any new coal-fired power plants to offset all of their carbon emissions. But North Dakota officials, backed by coal and utility interests, contested the de facto ban, suing Minnesota for hampering interstate commerce.
 
The judge agreed that the provision violated the Constitution’s commerce clause, striking it down as a “classic example of extraterritorial regulation” and arguing that if every state tried to do this sort of thing, “the current marketplace for electricity would come to a grinding halt.”
 
“It is a complete victory for us,” said North Dakota Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem.Unfortunately, the bad neighbor argument goes both ways — while Minnesota gets 46 percent of its electricity from coal, in North Dakota the dirty fuel source accounts for 79 percent of power generation. “I will defend the State of Minnesota’s right to protect the quality of the air our citizens breathe,” said Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton, vowing to appeal the decision. “In this case, North Dakota operators propose to build new, coal-fired power-generating plants without offsetting emission reductions. Prevailing winds will carry those toxic emissions directly into Minnesota. That shameful practice should not be permitted by either the state or federal government.”
 
 
Source: http://www.salon.com/