Guest columnist: Into the sunset with coal
29 Dec 2016
A couple days ago, I asked this question of my environmental science students: “Given that West Virginia has about 1.8 million people, how many of them do you think are employed by coal companies?” What would you guess?
The responses of my high school students ranged from 600,000 to 1.2 million. Those were high estimates, but would you guess that only about 15,000 residents of West Virginia are employed in the coal industry? The U.S. Energy Information Administration calculates the number of coal mining jobs in all of Appalachia to be just under 38,000; East of the Mississippi River that number is under 50,000, with a U.S. total of 66,000 coal mining jobs in 2015. In 1985, there were about 178,000 jobs in coal mining, so the trend is downward. Contrast that to the number of jobs being created in the renewable energy sector: Fortune estimates that 174,000 U.S. residents were employed in the solar industry alone in 2014, and the International Renewable Energy Agency reports that there were 769,000 total jobs in the U.S. renewable energy sector in 2015. A recent New York Times article states that Elon Musk, of Tesla and Solar City, has created nearly 35,000 jobs in manufacturing green energy components all by himself.
Our president-elect campaigned quite successfully as one who would “bring back coal,” and “kill” the Clean Power Plan (if implemented, the CPP would undoubtedly lead to less electricity with coal) when coal is not coming back. Economists and even electricity-generation executives agree that coal is on its way out, and for good reasons. First and foremost, for electricity generators, coal is more expensive than natural gas, which is now abundant given wide-spread use of hydraulic fracturing.
For those concerned about greenhouse gas emissions and climate change (and every one of us should be concerned!), the stake in the heart of coal is that it produces twice the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (mining, construction, generation, decommission, etc.) as natural gas, twenty times that of solar photovoltaic, and forty times that of wind. GHG emissions is only part of the story, because the use of coal as a power source brings numerous external costs, such as reduction in life expectancy (particulates, sulfur dioxide, mercury, etc.), ecosystem loss and degradation, loss of IQ (mercury), and hospital respiratory admissions, to name a few. Never mind the Clean Coal campaigns in the coal fields of Appalachia — coal is not clean!
Before I am written off as an out-of-touch, tree-hugging liberal, know that I lived the first twenty-three years of my life in Coal City, West Virginia (you read that correctly), and that my father, my two grandfathers, and numerous uncles made their living in — you guessed it — coal. My mother was born on a mountain, just a couple of miles from my childhood home, that no longer exists because of mountaintop removal for coal extraction. Coal mining can, indeed, pay an excellent wage (the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates the median wage to be over $25 per hour), but so can careers in the green industries of energy efficiency and renewable energy.
If we as a nation decided once and for all that we throw most our efforts into developing these industries and humanely (in terms of taking care of those whose livelihood is affected, including job training and education) phasing out industries that are more extractive and polluting, just how many good-paying, earth-friendly jobs could we create? We could even become the world leaders in this arena — instead of China — exporting technologies and services around the world. Now that’s an idea we can all get behind.
Michael Hill teaches mathematics and environmental science, and he is co-founder (with his wife) of 4X4 for Wild. He lives in Asheville.
Source: Citizen Times