APMDC Suliyari coal upcoming auction 1,00,000 MT for MP MSME on 1st Oct 2024 / 1st Nov 2024 & 2nd Dec 2024 @ SBP INR 2516/- per MT

APMDC Suliyari coal upcoming auction 75,000 MT for Pan India Open on 15th Oct 2024 / 15th Nov 2024 & 16th Dec 2024 @ SBP INR 3000/- per MT

Notice regarding Bidder Demo of CIL Tranche VII STEEL-Coking SUB-SECTOR of NRS Linkage e-Auction scheduled on 19.09.2024 from 12:30 P.M. to 1:30 P.M. in Coaljunction portal

Login Register Contact Us
Welcome to Linkage e-Auctions Welcome to Coal Trading Portal Welcome to APMDC Suliyari Coal

Coal news and updates

How were unscrupulous firms allocated coal blocks: Court

01 Sep 2015

A special court hearing the coal scam cases today wondered as to how "unscrupulous companies" were allocated coal blocks and the Ministry of Coal (MoC) did not scrutinise the applications filed by the firms either before or after the approval granted by PMO.

"Was it a coincidence that although there was no scrutiny of applications in the Ministry of Coal, the coal blocks were allocated to unscrupulous companies," asked Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar.

The court's observation came when the advocates appearing for former Coal Secretary H C Gupta and senior public servant K C Samria argued that there was shortage of manpower in the Ministry to scrutinise the large number of almost 1,400 applications received seeking coal block allocation.

Questioning their defence, the court also remarked, "Forget those 1,400 applications (received by the Ministry). Once the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) cleared or gave the approval for letter of allocation to the companies, what prevented you (MoC) from scrutinising those few applications which were given approval."

The defence counsel, however, claimed it was not "humanly possible" to scrutinise these huge number of applications as there were only six officials in the MoC's CA-I section where the applications were received.

"Only six officers were there in the MoC to scrutinise all these 1,400 applications, that too in a time bound manner. This was not humanly possible. These applications were too voluminous," advocate B S Mathur, who appeared for Gupta, told the court during arguments on framing of charges in the case.

The defence counsel also argued that there might be negligence on the part of MoC officials in not scrutinising these applications but there was "no guilty mind or conspiracy" on their part.

The court was hearing arguments on framing of charges in the case pertaining to alleged irregularities in allocation of Thesgora-B Rudrapuri  coal block in Madhya Pradesh to accused firm Kamal Sponge Steel and Power Ltd ( KSSPL).

source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com