Germany, France and Italy Respond to Gas Crisis: More Coal, More Oil, New Suppliers
12 Jul 2022
Russia’s threats to
cut off gas supply to the EU has led countries to seek out unforeseen measures
that could jeopardise their climate promises
The
Ukraine-Russia war has been ongoing for almost five months, a time-period which
has seen mass destruction, civilian deaths, huge displacement, global food
shortages, and the significant disruption of the global energy system, driving oil and
gas prices to their highest levels in almost a decade.
The
Russia-Ukraine War has thus had profound geopolitical implications, forcing many countries to
reconsider their energy supplies.
The International Energy Agency reports that Russia’s
natural gas exports fuel the European economy, supplying around 40% of the
European Union’s natural gas, over 25% of its oil, and half of its coal in
2019, with some countries receiving a higher proportion.
Over the
last months, the
US, UK and EU countries amongst others have tried to sever energy dependence on
Russia, imposing
economic sanctions and weaning themselves off Russian fuels, but Russian oil
and gas did continue to flow to Western
nations, even
after Putin himself made this more difficult signing a decree that changed the payment
currency for Russian energy into Roubles, alongside other actions.
Despite
sanctions, Russia in fact profited greatly,
redirecting fuel elsewhere on the global market and gaining from sky-high fuel
prices. Nevertheless, the European Commission has
released plans to curb Russian gas
imports by around two-thirds by the end of the year, by increasing imports of natural gas from the US and
Middle East, redirecting gas from Asia, and accelerating the green energy
transition.
Currently,
however, many
EU countries and the UK still remain reliant on Russian oil for about 1/5
of supplies, says ICIS consultancy, even after obtaining more oil
and gas from other sources and despite all the sanctions and renewable
transition efforts. This is problematic because it means Russia can constrain
gas supply to Europe for political motivations.
Already
in June, Russia reduced flows through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, its main route for shipping gas into western Europe, to 40% of its
capacity, driving up gas prices in Europe by 30%.
Further
constraints would have severe impacts on European economies which are already
facing crisis, and on the environment as they would force countries to resort
to more polluting and available fuels that are in direct confrontation with the
environmental targets of reaching net zero emissions.
Germany,
France, and Italy, who have committed to end their support for
overseas fossil fuel projects, have now stated that investment in this sector
is necessary as a temporary response to the current crisis.
Speaking
to reporters at the G7 summit, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said that the
“future does not lie in gas” but that in the short-term, gas is going to be
necessary and that investments in it in the transitional phase “are going to
have to be supported.”
Today,
less than a month after the initial
reduction to 40% of capacity in mid-June that was blamed on
Germany’s Siemens Energy delayed maintenance works, Kremlin-backed Gazprom shut down
NS1 entirely for maintenance.
Gazprom’s
suspension for maintenance is not unusual and takes place annually, but unlike
other years, it has raised fears that Russia is starting a wider squeeze on
European gas supplies in response to EU sanctions and that NS1 could perhaps
not reopen when scheduled to. German Vice-Chancellor Habeck accordingly said
that Russia’s reason for reducing gas supplies is a “strategy” to unsettle
people and drive-up prices.
Germany reactivates coal plants: A “climate policy disaster” or a necessary
measure for energy security
Impacts
of Russian gas disruption are felt particularly acutely in Germany as it relies on Russia for roughly
a third of its natural gas and coal and for more than one-third of its oil.
If
Russian gas flow through the Nord Stream 1 doesn’t continue at all after the
maintenance break, the economic cost of business disruption could
reach 193 billion euros in
the second half of 2022.
The EU
has rules to prevent and respond to a disruption in gas supplies, where member
states must have plans in place for managing supply disruption at three levels
of crisis: early warning, alert, and emergency.
After the
recent curbing of Nord Stream 1, Germany passed emergency
legislation in
Parliament to reactivate some of its coal power plants to support electricity
generation, along with measures to boost the expansion of renewable energy and increase LNG imports from