NPS’s coal phase-out policy poses financial risk of state utility firms
22 Aug 2022
The latest move by South Korea’s largest
institutional investor National Pension Service to seek to cut investment in
power companies with high coal dependency under ESG principles is expected to
aggravate financial woes of the country’s state-run utility firms.
The Korean national pension operator’s fund
management committee is reviewing a plan to decide its investment in power
companies based on the share of their coal business in total revenue, according
to industry sources on Sunday. The committee currently is said to be
considering setting the limit on coal-based power generation to between 30
percent and 50 percent, meaning that the NPS would not be allowed to invest in
a power company that generates more than 30 to 50 percent of its revenue from
coal-based power generation.
Its decision will be made around the end of this
year.
The NPS’s new investment direction is expected to
put five of Korea’s state-run power companies at risk of losing investment from
the largest institutional investor in Korea and the world’s third largest
pension service whose investment practice is closely followed by other
investors.
As of June, Korea South-East Power earns 68
percent of its revenue from coal-fired power generation, Korea East-West Power
63 percent, Korea Western Power 57 percent, Korea Midland Power 51 percent, and
Korea Southern Power 50 percent.
If the NPS sets its limit at 50 percent, all five
state power companies would not be able to receive any investment from the
public pension manager, which could worsen their financial health.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare, overseeing the
NPS, is standing firm on its position to limit investment in coal companies
under ESG principles.
Considering the ESG trend in investment, it is
difficult to change the investment policy, said a health and welfare ministry
officer. But the ministry will determine the investment limit with prudence as
the local power companies still have high dependency on coal-fired power
generation and bear the brunt of higher energy costs from the prolonged
Russia’s war in Ukraine, added the official.
According to data from the Financial Supervisory
Service, all five state power firms reported operating losses in the second
quarter ended June this year due to softening system marginal prices, or
wholesale electricity market prices.